Track Emerging Research Topics with OpenAlex
Schedule recent OpenAlex searches and compare works, topics, institutions, and citations over time.

Research trends develop through new papers, changing terminology, institutional participation, and citation growth. A repeatable monitor needs stable queries and comparable snapshots. The OpenAlex Research Scraper provides those records through scheduled Apify Tasks.
Define a topic portfolio
Keep each theme explicit so changes can be attributed to the correct query.
{
"queries": ["small language models", "world models", "multimodal agents"],
"fromPublicationYear": 2025,
"maxResultsPerQuery": 100
}Run a baseline, validate relevance, and save the input. For query-membership analysis, separate Tasks are clearer because combined runs deduplicate repeated works by OpenAlex ID.
Compare valid snapshots
Store every successful dataset with run time, query, cap, and filters. New IDs represent newly observed records, not necessarily newly published papers: metadata updates can cause older work to appear. Use publication dates to distinguish those cases.
Count papers, institutions, sources, and topics only after handling arrays consistently. Preserve missing affiliations instead of assigning them to an “unknown institution” that looks like a real organization. Citation growth should compare the same OpenAlex ID across snapshots and account for age.
Review the top new titles and abstracts manually. Topic labels are generated classifications and can drift; use them as navigation rather than ground truth. A query hitting its cap makes trend counts incomplete, so raise the cap or narrow the scope before interpreting growth.
Send alerts for newly observed high-relevance works or institutions, but include DOI, landing page, query, publication date, and collection time. Research intelligence is credible when every alert leads back to the source record and the monitored population remains documented.
Frequently asked questions
How do I identify newly found works?
Compare OpenAlex IDs against the previous successful snapshot and retain the query with each record.
Are citation counts fair across years?
No. Older works have had more time to accumulate citations, so compare appropriate cohorts.