Skip to main content
Thirdwatchthirdwatch
General

Track Asteroid Size and Velocity from NASA NeoWs

Compare NASA asteroid diameter estimates and approach velocities without hiding uncertainty or units.

Jul 21, 2026 · 1 min read · 242 words
See the scraper →

Asteroid comparisons often collapse estimated size into one number and quote speed without the reference frame or approach context. The NASA Near-Earth Objects Scraper returns minimum and maximum estimated diameter plus relative velocity for the modeled close approach.

Preserve uncertainty in the data model

Validate derived categories against the raw range rather than only its midpoint. An object near a threshold can move between categories under reasonable assumptions, so interfaces should expose the estimates instead of presenting the label as measured fact.

{"startDate":"2026-07-20","endDate":"2026-07-27","maxResults":250}

Keep estimated_diameter_min_km and estimated_diameter_max_km as separate fields. A midpoint can support visualization, but label it as derived and retain the range for tooltips and analysis. Store relative velocity in kilometers per hour with the approach date and orbiting body; a speed detached from its encounter is incomplete.

Use NASA ID to deduplicate objects across overlapping feed windows. If an object has multiple approaches, do not average the velocities into one timeless property. Model each encounter separately. Hazard and sentry flags can be displayed as official classifications, but size and speed alone should not be turned into an impact-risk score.

For communication, show distributions rather than cherry-picking the fastest or largest record. Explain that estimates and orbital solutions can improve. Link each item to JPL, keep collection dates, and version any derived categories such as small, medium, or large. These practices make the dataset useful for comparison without converting uncertain scientific measurements into false precision.

Frequently asked questions

Why does NASA give a diameter range?

Size is estimated from brightness and assumptions rather than directly measured for every object.

Can velocity and diameter be multiplied into a risk score?

Not responsibly without orbital probability and a validated scientific model.

Related

Try it yourself

100 free credits, no credit card.

About 30 real searches. Add the MCP to Claude or Cursor in two minutes.