Skip to main content
Thirdwatchthirdwatch
E-commerce & products

Track AJIO vs Myntra India Fashion Pricing (2026 Guide)

Build an AJIO-vs-Myntra India fashion-pricing tracker with Thirdwatch — daily MRP, discount and brand-level deltas, Python recipes, and SKU matching tips.

May 12, 2026 · 5 min read · 1,125 words
See the scraper →

Thirdwatch's AJIO Scraper and Myntra Scraper feed a cross-platform India fashion-pricing tracker — daily snapshot of the same brand or keyword watchlist on both platforms, compute price and discount deltas, surface where private-label vs third-party brands diverge. Built for India fashion ops, brand teams managing dual marketplace listings, growth analysts optimising marketplace spend, and price-comparison product builders.

Why track AJIO vs Myntra India fashion pricing

India online fashion is a near-duopoly with Nykaa-Fashion as the close third. According to the RedSeer 2024 fashion ecom report, Myntra and AJIO together capture the majority of the roughly $9–10B online fashion GMV — and they price the same brand catalog differently. The same Levi's 511 slim jean retails at ₹2,799 on Myntra and ₹2,499 on AJIO over one weekend, and inverts the next. AJIO leans on Reliance Retail's house brands (AJIO Own, Netplay, Performax) for aggressive private-label discounting; Myntra leans on first-party HRX, Roadster and a deeper third-party catalog. The delta is structural, not noise.

For brand ops teams, growth marketers, and analysts, that delta is operational signal. The job-to-be-done is structured: a brand ops team manages 300 SKUs across both marketplaces and needs daily price-parity alerts. A growth team optimising marketplace ad spend wants to flag the cheaper-priced marketplace per SKU before it bids. A market analyst builds a longitudinal dataset of India fashion EOSS rhythms. A consumer price-comparison app ingests both as data layers. All reduce to dual-platform snapshots, SKU matching, and delta computation.

How does this compare to the alternatives?

Approach Reliability Setup time Maintenance
Manual price-checking across both sites Low — doesn't scale beyond a handful of SKUs Continuous analyst time Continuous
Indian price-comparison SaaS (MySmartPrice, Pricepe) High, but bundled with consumer UI and affiliate logic Days Vendor lock-in, paid tier
Thirdwatch AJIO + Myntra Scrapers Production-tested, anti-bot handled Half a day to wire up Thirdwatch maintains both

Indian price-comparison SaaS is priced for consumer-app operators bundling affiliate revenue. The Thirdwatch AJIO Scraper plus Myntra Scraper give you raw structured data at competitively priced pay-per-result, with no vendor lock-in and no use-case gating.

How to track AJIO vs Myntra prices in 5 steps

Step 1: How do I authenticate against Apify?

export APIFY_TOKEN="apify_api_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

Step 2: How do I pull both platforms in parallel?

Spawn one run for AJIO and one for Myntra against the same brand watchlist.

import os, json, datetime, pathlib
from apify_client import ApifyClient

client = ApifyClient(os.environ["APIFY_TOKEN"])

BRAND_WATCH = ["levis 511 slim jean", "allen solly mens shirt",
               "biba kurta set", "hrx tshirt", "puma running shoes",
               "tommy hilfiger polo", "fossil mens watch"]

ajio_run = client.actor("thirdwatch/ajio-scraper").call(run_input={
    "queries": BRAND_WATCH, "sortBy": "popularity", "maxResults": 60,
}, wait_secs=600)

myntra_run = client.actor("thirdwatch/myntra-scraper").call(run_input={
    "queries": BRAND_WATCH, "maxResults": 60,
}, wait_secs=600)

ajio = list(client.dataset(ajio_run["defaultDatasetId"]).iterate_items())
myntra = list(client.dataset(myntra_run["defaultDatasetId"]).iterate_items())

today = datetime.date.today().isoformat()
pathlib.Path("snapshots").mkdir(exist_ok=True)
pathlib.Path(f"snapshots/ajio-{today}.json").write_text(json.dumps(ajio))
pathlib.Path(f"snapshots/myntra-{today}.json").write_text(json.dumps(myntra))
print(f"{today}: AJIO {len(ajio)}, Myntra {len(myntra)}")

Step 3: How do I match the same SKU across AJIO and Myntra?

There is no shared product ID. Use brand as a hard filter and rapidfuzz for product-name similarity.

import pandas as pd
from rapidfuzz import fuzz, process

a = pd.DataFrame(ajio)[["sku", "brand", "product_name", "price", "original_price", "discount_percent", "url"]]
m = pd.DataFrame(myntra)[["product_id", "brand", "title", "price", "mrp", "discount_percent", "url"]]
m = m.rename(columns={"title": "product_name"})

a["brand_key"] = a.brand.str.lower().str.strip()
m["brand_key"] = m.brand.str.lower().str.strip()

pairs = []
for brand_key, ag in a.groupby("brand_key"):
    mg = m[m.brand_key == brand_key]
    if mg.empty: continue
    for _, ar in ag.iterrows():
        best = process.extractOne(
            ar.product_name, mg.product_name.tolist(),
            scorer=fuzz.token_set_ratio, score_cutoff=85,
        )
        if best:
            mr = mg.iloc[best[2]]
            pairs.append({
                "brand": ar.brand, "name_ajio": ar.product_name, "name_myntra": mr.product_name,
                "ajio_price": ar.price, "myntra_price": mr.price,
                "ajio_mrp": ar.original_price, "myntra_mrp": mr.mrp,
                "match_score": best[1],
            })
matched = pd.DataFrame(pairs)
print(f"{len(matched)} matched SKU pairs")

token_set_ratio at 85 is the production-tested cutoff for India fashion — high enough to avoid cross-style confusion ("slim fit" vs "regular fit"), low enough to absorb the platforms' inconsistent title formatting.

Step 4: How do I compute the price delta and flag arbitrage?

matched["delta"] = matched.ajio_price - matched.myntra_price
matched["delta_pct"] = matched.delta / matched[["ajio_price", "myntra_price"]].min(axis=1) * 100

arbitrage = matched[matched.delta_pct.abs() >= 10].copy()
arbitrage["cheaper_on"] = arbitrage.delta.apply(lambda d: "myntra" if d > 0 else "ajio")
print(arbitrage[["brand", "name_ajio", "ajio_price", "myntra_price",
                 "delta_pct", "cheaper_on"]].head(20))

A 10%+ gap with both products in stock is the canonical arbitrage signal. Gaps below 10% are usually coupon-stack or shipping-fee noise and not worth alerting on.

Step 5: How do I post a daily delta digest to Slack?

import requests as r

def fmt(row):
    sign = "+" if row.delta > 0 else ""
    return (f"*{row.brand}{row.name_ajio[:40]}*: "
            f"AJIO ₹{int(row.ajio_price):,} vs Myntra ₹{int(row.myntra_price):,} "
            f"({sign}{row.delta_pct:.1f}% on {row.cheaper_on})")

top = arbitrage.sort_values("delta_pct", key=abs, ascending=False).head(10)
r.post("https://hooks.slack.com/services/.../...",
       json={"text": "AJIO vs Myntra deltas today:\n" + "\n".join(top.apply(fmt, axis=1))},
       timeout=10)

For an active ops team a 10-row daily digest in Slack with the largest deltas is the right cadence — enough signal to act on without alert fatigue.

Sample output

A matched-pair record after running the joining logic above:

[
  {
    "brand": "Levi's",
    "name_ajio": "Men's 511 Slim Fit Jean",
    "name_myntra": "Men 511 Slim Fit Stretchable Jeans",
    "ajio_price": 2499,
    "myntra_price": 2799,
    "ajio_mrp": 4999,
    "myntra_mrp": 4999,
    "ajio_discount": 50,
    "myntra_discount": 44,
    "delta_pct": -12.0,
    "cheaper_on": "ajio",
    "match_score": 91
  },
  {
    "brand": "Biba",
    "name_ajio": "Printed Anarkali Kurta Set with Dupatta",
    "name_myntra": "Women Printed Anarkali Kurta with Dupatta",
    "ajio_price": 2199,
    "myntra_price": 2099,
    "ajio_mrp": 3999,
    "myntra_mrp": 3999,
    "ajio_discount": 45,
    "myntra_discount": 47,
    "delta_pct": 4.6,
    "cheaper_on": "myntra",
    "match_score": 88
  }
]

The match_score field is your trust signal — scores above 90 are safe for automated alerting; 85–90 should be human-reviewed before pricing decisions; below 85 is filtered out by the pipeline.

Common pitfalls

Three things go wrong in production AJIO-vs-Myntra trackers. Brand-string normalisation — AJIO writes "Levi's" while Myntra sometimes writes "Levis"; lower-case + strip-apostrophes before joining or you'll miss half the pairs. Coupon-stack price drift — both platforms layer additional coupons at checkout that aren't reflected in the listing price; for headline-discount marketing comparison this is fine, but for effective-cost arbitrage you'll under-call the gap. Sale-window divergence — AJIO EOSS and Myntra EORS run on overlapping but not identical calendars; some "deltas" are just one platform being mid-sale and the other not. Flag sale windows in your downstream analytics and don't treat them as steady-state signal.

Thirdwatch handles AJIO's and Myntra's anti-bot defences transparently. Both actors emit consistent, dedupable rows from a single keyword input — small enough to run hourly during EOSS, cheap enough to run daily year-round on a 300-SKU watchlist.

Related use cases

Frequently asked questions

Why compare AJIO and Myntra prices?

AJIO and Myntra are the two largest pure-play India online fashion marketplaces and they price overlapping brands differently because of different seller bases, sale calendars, and coupon-stack rules. For brand ops teams managing dual listings, growth teams optimising marketplace spend, and consumer-app builders, the daily delta is operational signal worth tracking.

How do I match the same SKU across AJIO and Myntra?

There is no shared product identifier between AJIO and Myntra. Three approaches work in production: exact-substring match on brand plus product_name (best for known SKUs), fuzzy string distance for long-tail products, and image-perceptual-hash comparison when you can fetch image_url from both. Most pipelines use the first plus brand as a hard filter.

What's the right cadence for this tracker?

Daily during steady-state, every 2 to 4 hours during EOSS windows on either platform. AJIO and Myntra run their end-of-season sales on partly overlapping calendars; missing intraday price moves during those windows means missing the deal. For a 300-SKU watchlist, even hourly cadence stays affordable on pay-per-result pricing.

How do I read the AJIO discount_percent vs Myntra discount field?

AJIO returns a numeric discount_percent parsed from its display string. Myntra returns a similar percentage. Both reference the platform's stated MRP, but neither always reflects post-coupon effective price. For arbitrage decisions compute effective price as (price minus coupon_value) and ignore the headline percentage; for marketing-claim comparison use the headline directly.

How does this compare to Indian price-comparison apps?

Apps like MySmartPrice and Pricepe bundle cross-marketplace tracking with consumer ads and affiliate revenue. Building your own AJIO-plus-Myntra tracker on Thirdwatch actors is meaningfully cheaper for systematic operational use and gives you raw structured data instead of a consumer UI. SaaS wins when you need a customer-facing app on top of the data.

Are private-label vs third-party brand comparisons fair?

Not directly. AJIO Own, Netplay, Performax (private label) discount differently from third-party brands like Levi's, Allen Solly or Biba. Segment by brand category before comparing; AJIO private-label vs Myntra HRX private-label is a fair comparison, but AJIO Own vs Myntra Tommy Hilfiger is not.

Related

Try it yourself

100 free credits, no credit card.

About 30 real searches. Add the MCP to Claude or Cursor in two minutes.